Select committees

Committee business summary

Content provider
House of Representatives
Information
Date:
3 September 2013
Downloads
Note: The above document(s) are provided as an Adobe PDF (PortableDocument Format) file. you can download a free viewer for PDF files from Adobe's web site.
Related documents
Related links

Question of privilege concerning the defamation action Attorney-General and Gow v Leigh

Description

The Speaker referred a question of privilege regarding a decision of the Supreme Court to the Privileges Committee for consideration. The court, in its decision in Attorney-General and Gow v Leigh - [2011] NZSC 106, held that statements made by an official to a Minister for the purpose of replying to questions for oral answer are not themselves parliamentary proceedings. Such statements could therefore be the subject of court proceedings as they would not be protected by absolute privilege. In its report to the House, the committee disagreed with the court’s decision and recommended that a Parliamentary Privilege Bill be introduced to clarify for the avoidance of doubt the nature of parliamentary privilege in New Zealand.

Committee:Privileges
Type of business:Matter of Privilege
Parliament:49
Date referred:27/9/11
Submissions closing date:29/10/12
Date reported:11/6/13
Government response reported:3/9/13