The House met at 2.00 pm.
6. Government orders of the day
Ngāti Mutunga Claims Settlement Bill and Business Law Reform Bill
The House resolved itself into Committee for consideration of the Ngāti Mutunga Claims Settlement Bill and Business Law Reform Bill.
(In the Committee)
Ngāti Mutunga Claims Settlement Bill
The Preamble read.
Resolved, That the Preamble stand part.
Part 1 read.
The following amendments were tabled:
Clause 7:
-
Subclause (1)(b): to omit “and its principles”.
-
Subclause (2)(e): to omit “and its principles”.
-
Subclause (5): to omit “and its principles”.
-
Subclause (6)(c): to omit “and its principles”.
-
Subclause (7)(d)(ii): to omit “and its principles”.
-
Subclause (10): to omit “and its principles”.
Clause 8:
-
Subclause (1)(b): to omit “me ona matapono”.
-
Subclause (2)(e): to omit “me ona matapono”.
-
Subclause (5): to omit “me ona matapono”.
-
Subclause (6)(c): to omit “me ona matapono”.
-
Subclause (7)(d)(ii): to omit “me ona matapono”.
-
Subclause (10): to omit “me ona matapono”.
Clause 9:
-
Subclause (7): to omit “and its principles”.
Clause 10:
-
Subclause (7): to omit “me ona matapono” (Pita Paraone).
Amendments ruled out of order as purporting to amend an agreement reached between the Crown and another party.
The following amendment was put:
Clause 14:
-
Subclause (1)(a)(i)(A): to omit “or the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti o Waitangi)” (Pita Paraone).
On the question, That the amendment be agreed to, the votes were recorded as follows:
Amendment not agreed to.
Resolved, That Part 1 stand part.
Part 2 read.
Resolved, That Part 2 stand part.
Part 3 read.
Resolved, That Part 3 stand part.
The following amendment was tabled:
New Part 4:
-
To add the following Part:
Amendment ruled out of order as being outside the scope of the bill and in the nature of private legislation.
Resolved, That the Chairperson report progress to obtain the Speaker’s ruling on the admissibility of a proposed amendment that the Chairperson had ruled out of order as being outside the scope of the bill and in the nature of private legislation (Hon Tau Henare).
Speaker’s Ruling
The Speaker resumed the Chair, and the Chairperson reported that she had been directed to report progress to obtain the Speaker’s ruling on the admissibility of a proposed amendment that the Chairperson had ruled out of order as being outside the scope of the bill and in the nature of private legislation. The Speaker ruled on the matter referred to her on motion by the Committee.
The House resolved itself into Committee for further consideration of the Ngāti Mutunga Claims Settlement Bill and for consideration of the Business Law Reform Bill.
(In the Committee)
Ngāti Mutunga Claims Settlement Bill
Schedule 1 read.
Resolved, That Schedule 1 stand part.
Schedule 2 read.
Resolved, That Schedule 2 stand part.
Schedule 3 read.
Resolved, That Schedule 3 stand part.
Schedule 4 read.
Resolved, That Schedule 4 stand part.
Schedule 5 read.
Resolved, That Schedule 5 stand part.
Clauses 1 and 2 read.
Resolved, That clause 1 stand part.
Resolved, That clause 2 stand part.
The Chairperson announced that the bill would be reported presently without amendment.
Part 1 read.
The following amendments were put:
Part 1:
-
Amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 72 (Hon Lianne Dalziel).
Resolved, That the amendments be agreed to.
Resolved, That Part 1, as amended, stand part.
Part 2 read.
Resolved, That Part 2 stand part.
Part 3 read.
The following amendments were put:
Part 3:
-
Amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 72 (Hon Lianne Dalziel).
Resolved, That the amendments be agreed to.
Resolved, That Part 3, as amended, stand part.
Part 4 read.
Resolved, That Part 4 stand part.
Part 5 read.
The following amendment was put:
Clause 57:
-
Amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 72 (Hon Lianne Dalziel).
Resolved, That the amendment be agreed to.
Resolved, That Part 5, as amended, stand part.
The Schedule read.
The following amendment was put:
Schedule:
-
Amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 72 (Hon Lianne Dalziel).
Resolved, That the amendment be agreed to.
Resolved, That the Schedule, as amended, stand part.
Clauses 1 and 2 read.
Resolved, That clause 1 stand part.
The following amendments were put:
Clause 2:
-
Amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 72 (Hon Lianne Dalziel).
Resolved, That the amendments be agreed to.
Resolved, That clause 2, as amended, stand part.
Resolved, That the bill be divided into five bills as set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 73 (Hon Lianne Dalziel).
The Chairperson announced that the bill would be reported with amendment and divided into five bills.
Reporting of bills
The Speaker resumed the Chair, and the Chairperson reported the Ngāti Mutunga Claims Settlement Bill without amendment.
The Chairperson also reported the Business Law Reform Bill with amendment and that the Committee had divided it into the following bills:
-
Companies Amendment Bill (No 2)
-
Dumping and Countervailing Duties Amendment Bill
-
Financial Reporting Amendment Bill
-
Friendly Societies and Credit Unions Amendment Bill
-
Insurance Companies’ Deposits Amendment Bill.
The report was adopted and the bills were set down for third reading next sitting day.
Geographical Indications (Wine and Spirits) Registration Bill
Hon Judith Tizard moved, and the question was proposed, That the Geographical Indications (Wine and Spirits) Registration Bill be now read a third time.
On the question, That the motion be agreed to, the votes were recorded as follows:
The bill was read a third time.
Property Law Bill
The Property Law Bill was read a first time and stood referred to a select committee.
Resolved, That the Justice and Electoral Committee consider the bill (Hon Clayton Cosgrove).
Human Tissue Bill
The Human Tissue Bill was read a first time and stood referred to a select committee.
Resolved, That the Health Committee consider the bill (Hon Pete Hodgson).
Social Security (Long-term Residential Care) Amendment Bill
The House resolved itself into Committee for consideration of the Social Security (Long-term Residential Care) Amendment Bill.
(In the Committee)
Part 1 read.
The following amendments were put:
Clause 6:
-
Amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 74 (Sue Bradford).
On the question, That the amendment be agreed to, the votes were recorded as follows:
Amendment not agreed to.
Clause 8:
-
Amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 74 (Sue Bradford).
On the question, That the amendment be agreed to, the votes were recorded as follows:
Amendment not agreed to.
The following amendment was tabled:
New clause 8A:
-
Amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 74 (Sue Bradford).
Amendment ruled out of order as inconsistent with a previous decision of the Committee.
The following amendments were put:
New clause 8A:
-
Amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 63 (Dr Paul Hutchison).
On the question, That the amendment be agreed to, the votes were recorded as follows:
Amendment not agreed to.
Part 1:
-
Amendments set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 69 (Hon Pete Hodgson).
On the question, That the amendments be agreed to, the votes were recorded as follows:
Resolved, That the amendments be agreed to.
On the question, That Part 1, as amended, stand part, the votes were recorded as follows:
Resolved, That Part 1, as amended, stand part.
Part 2 read.
Resolved, That Part 2 stand part.
The Schedule read.
Resolved, That the Schedule stand part.
Clauses 1, 2 and 3 read.
Resolved, That clause 1 stand part.
The following amendment was put:
Clause 2:
-
Amendment set out on Supplementary Order Paper No 69 (Hon Pete Hodgson).
Resolved, That the amendment be agreed to.
Resolved, That clause 2, as amended, stand part.
Resolved, That clause 3 stand part.
The Chairperson announced that the bill would be reported with amendment.
Reporting of bills
The Speaker resumed the Chair, and the Chairperson reported the Social Security (Long-term Residential Care) Amendment Bill with amendment.
The report was adopted and the bill set down for third reading next sitting day.
Evidence Bill
Hon Rick Barker for Hon Mark Burton moved, and the question was proposed, That the Evidence Bill be now read a second time.